What are the chances of seeing a Calamanthus pyrrhopygius in Blue Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Calamanthus pyrrhopygius sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 113 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 110th most-seen of the 196 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Calamanthus pyrrhopygius in Blue Mountains National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Calamanthus pyrrhopygius in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Calamanthus pyrrhopygius?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Calamanthus pyrrhopygius sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see a Calamanthus pyrrhopygius?
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Calamanthus pyrrhopygius sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%), Royal National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Grampians National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Calamanthus pyrrhopygius live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Acanthizidae
The closest relatives of the Calamanthus pyrrhopygius that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Acanthizidae, Thornbills and Allies) are Brown Thornbill (about 60%), White-browed Scrubwren (about 40%) and Striated Thornbill (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Calamanthus pyrrhopygius sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Calamanthus pyrrhopygius is recorded against all the birds logged in Blue Mountains National Park (113 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.