What are the chances of seeing an Eriococcus Caterpillar in Blue Mountains National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eriococcus Caterpillar sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 272nd most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eriococcus Caterpillar in Blue Mountains National Park?
March–May and August–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eriococcus Caterpillar in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and June–July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Eriococcus Caterpillar?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eriococcus Caterpillar sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see an Eriococcus Caterpillar?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Eriococcus Caterpillar sightings, Blue Mountains National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Eriococcus Caterpillar live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same genus: Stathmopoda
The closest relatives of the Eriococcus Caterpillar that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (genus Stathmopoda) are Stathmopoda auriferella (about 10%) and Stathmopoda megathyma (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eriococcus Caterpillar sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eriococcus Caterpillar is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.