What are the chances of seeing a Fruit Tree Borer in Blue Mountains National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fruit Tree Borer sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 409th most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fruit Tree Borer in Blue Mountains National Park?
November to January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fruit Tree Borer in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Fruit Tree Borer?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fruit Tree Borer sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see a Fruit Tree Borer?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Fruit Tree Borer sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Fruit Tree Borer live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Xyloryctidae
The closest relatives of the Fruit Tree Borer that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Xyloryctidae, Timber Moths) are Plectophila discalis (about 10%), Leistarcha scitissimella (about 10%) and Tymbophora peltastis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fruit Tree Borer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fruit Tree Borer is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.