What are the chances of seeing a Zalissa catocalina in Blue Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Zalissa catocalina sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 681st most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Zalissa catocalina in Blue Mountains National Park?
February and March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Zalissa catocalina in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to January, the lowest months. Those are among Blue Mountains National Park's wettest months, with about 140 mm of rain a month against 40 mm in May.
What time of day is best to see a Zalissa catocalina?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Zalissa catocalina sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Zalissa catocalina?
Only Blue Mountains National Park, in our data
Blue Mountains National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Zalissa catocalina sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Zalissa catocalina live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Zalissa catocalina that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Brown Cutworm (about 20%), Green-Blotched Moth (about 20%) and Bogong Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Zalissa catocalina sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Zalissa catocalina is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.