What are the chances of seeing a Pawiloma jucunda in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pawiloma jucunda sighting in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 75 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pawiloma jucunda in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Pawiloma jucunda in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in June and October–March, the lowest months. That is one of Calakmul Biosphere Reserve's wettest months, with about 130 mm of rain against 15 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Pawiloma jucunda?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pawiloma jucunda sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Calakmul Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Pawiloma jucunda?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Pawiloma jucunda sightings, Calakmul Biosphere Reserve ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (Guatemala, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Pawiloma jucunda live in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Pawiloma jucunda that you can see in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Meccus dimidiatus (about 10%) and Acanthocephala alata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pawiloma jucunda sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pawiloma jucunda is recorded against all the insects logged in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.