Oedemera podagrariae
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Oedemera podagrariae, common name false blister beetle, is a quite common species of beetles belonging to the family Oedemeridae subfamily Oedemerinae. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aigüestortes National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 2 | Cévennes National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 3 | Fertő-Hanság National Park | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 4 | Pyrénées National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 5 | Sierra de Guadarrama National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 6 | Bavarian Forest National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Oedemera podagrariae sighting in Cévennes National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 232nd most-seen of the 996 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Oedemera podagrariae in Cévennes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to April, the lowest months.
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Oedemera podagrariae sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
2nd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Oedemera podagrariae sightings, Cévennes National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%).
Same genus: Oedemera
The closest relatives of the Oedemera podagrariae that you can see in Cévennes National Park (genus Oedemera) are Yellow-Legged Thick-Legged Flower Beetle (about 20%), Thick-Legged Flower Beetle (about 10%) and Oedemera femoralis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Oedemera podagrariae is recorded against all the insects logged in Cévennes National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
