What are the chances of seeing a Spot-crowned Barbet in Chagres National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Spot-crowned Barbet sighting in Chagres National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 322nd most-seen of the 372 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Spot-crowned Barbet in Chagres National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Spot-crowned Barbet in Chagres National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Spot-crowned Barbet?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Spot-crowned Barbet sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chagres National Park the best place to see a Spot-crowned Barbet?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Spot-crowned Barbet sightings, Chagres National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 30%), Darién National Park (Panama, about 30%) and San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Spot-crowned Barbet live in Chagres National Park?
Same order: Piciformes
The closest relatives of the Spot-crowned Barbet that you can see in Chagres National Park (order Piciformes, Woodpeckers and Allies) are Keel-billed Toucan (about 50%), Black-cheeked Woodpecker (about 30%) and Stripe-cheeked Woodpecker (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Spot-crowned Barbet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Spot-crowned Barbet is recorded against all the birds logged in Chagres National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.