What are the chances of seeing an Undulated Antpitta in Chingaza National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Undulated Antpitta sighting in Chingaza National Natural Park on a given day, based on 107 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 68th most-seen of the 258 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Undulated Antpitta in Chingaza National Natural Park?
April and May
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Undulated Antpitta in Chingaza National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in November, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see an Undulated Antpitta?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Undulated Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chingaza National Natural Park the best place to see an Undulated Antpitta?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Undulated Antpitta sightings, Chingaza National Natural Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Podocarpus National Park (Ecuador, under 5%) and Los Nevados National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Undulated Antpitta live in Chingaza National Natural Park?
Same genus: Grallaria
The closest relatives of the Undulated Antpitta that you can see in Chingaza National Natural Park (genus Grallaria, Large Antpittas) are Muisca Antpitta (about 50%), Chestnut-crowned Antpitta (about 10%) and Boyaca Antpitta (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Undulated Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Undulated Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Chingaza National Natural Park (107 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.