Hypselonotus fulvus
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henri Pittier National Park | 🇻🇪 Venezuela | |
| 2 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fortaleza | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Santa Cruz de la Sierra | 🇧🇴 Bolivia | |
| 3 | Vitória | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 4 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | Brasilia | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 6 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 7 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypselonotus fulvus sighting in Brasilia on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 84th most-seen of the 102 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May–June and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypselonotus fulvus in Brasilia on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and November–April, the lowest months. Those are among Brasilia's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain a month against 220 mm in December.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hypselonotus fulvus sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
5th of 7
Of the 7 cities where we can rate Hypselonotus fulvus sightings, Brasilia ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Fortaleza (Brazil, about 20%), Santa Cruz de la Sierra (Bolivia, about 10%) and Vitória (Brazil, about 10%).
Same family: Coreidae
The closest relatives of the Hypselonotus fulvus that you can see in Brasilia (family Coreidae, Leaf-footed Bugs) are Sphictyrtus chrysis (about 10%) and Pachylis laticornis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hypselonotus fulvus is recorded against all the insects logged in Brasilia (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
