Membracis foliatafasciata
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goiânia | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Valencia | 🇻🇪 Venezuela | |
| 3 | Manaus | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 4 | Campinas | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | Belo Horizonte | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 6 | Campo Grande | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 7 | Brasilia | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 8 | Caracas | 🇻🇪 Venezuela |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-And-White Treehopper sighting in Brasilia on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 34th most-seen of the 102 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, June and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-And-White Treehopper in Brasilia on a given day, against under 5% in February, July–September and November–December, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-And-White Treehopper sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
7th of 8
Of the 8 cities where we can rate Black-And-White Treehopper sightings, Brasilia ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Goiânia (Brazil, about 20%), Valencia (Venezuela, about 20%) and Manaus (Brazil, about 20%).
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Black-And-White Treehopper that you can see in Brasilia (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Deois flavopicta (about 10%), Giant Cicada (about 10%) and Aetalion reticulatum (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-And-White Treehopper is recorded against all the insects logged in Brasilia (10 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
