Mythimna vitellina
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Mythimna vitellina, the delicate, is a moth of the family Noctuidae. The species was first described by Jacob Hübner in 1808. It is mainly distributed throughout southern Europe and the southern part of eastern Europe. It is also found far less commonly further north in Europe. Also in North Africa, the Near East and Middle East, Central Asia and western China. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pyrénées National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 2 | Cévennes National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 3 | Sierra de Guadarrama National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 4 | Wadden Sea National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a The Delicate sighting in Budapest on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 209th most-seen of the 404 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a The Delicate in Budapest on a given day, against under 5% in July and September–April, the lowest months.
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most The Delicate sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Among the best
Of the 8 cities where we can rate The Delicate sightings, Budapest ranks 4th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Porto (Portugal, about 10%), Madrid (Spain, about 10%) and Valencia (Spain, about 10%).
Same genus: Mythimna
The closest relatives of the The Delicate that you can see in Budapest (genus Mythimna) are The White-Point (about 10%) and L-Album Wainscot (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the The Delicate is recorded against all the insects logged in Budapest (9 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
