Hypanartia bella
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montevideo | 🇺🇾 Uruguay | |
| 2 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 3 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 4 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | Cordoba | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 6 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bella Mapwing sighting in Cordoba on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 55th most-seen of the 111 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Bella Mapwing in Cordoba on a given day, against under 5% in June and October–March, the lowest months. Those are among Cordoba's driest months, with about 35 mm of rain a month against 130 mm in February.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bella Mapwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
5th of 6
Of the 6 cities where we can rate Bella Mapwing sightings, Cordoba ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Montevideo (Uruguay, about 20%), Porto Alegre (Brazil, about 20%) and Buenos Aires (Argentina, about 10%).
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Bella Mapwing that you can see in Cordoba (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Gulf Fritillary (about 30%), Hortensia Fritillary (about 10%) and Ithra Crescent (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bella Mapwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Cordoba (8 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
