What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-Legged Grasshopper in Hong Kong?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-Legged Grasshopper sighting in Hong Kong on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 925th most-seen of the 1125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-Legged Grasshopper in Hong Kong?
August
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-Legged Grasshopper in Hong Kong on a given day, against under 5% in September to July, the lowest months. That is one of Hong Kong's wettest months, with about 220 mm of rain against 25 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-Legged Grasshopper?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-Legged Grasshopper sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hong Kong the best place to see a Rufous-Legged Grasshopper?
16th of 16
Of the 16 cities where we can rate Rufous-Legged Grasshopper sightings, Hong Kong ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Singapore (Singapore, about 30%), Thiruvananthapuram (India, about 30%) and Guwahati (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-Legged Grasshopper live in Hong Kong?
Same family: Acrididae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-Legged Grasshopper that you can see in Hong Kong (family Acrididae, Short-horned Grasshoppers) are Carinate Locust (about 10%), Ceracris nigricornis (about 10%) and Short-Winged Rice Grasshopper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-Legged Grasshopper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-Legged Grasshopper is recorded against all the insects logged in Hong Kong (6 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.