Agapanthia dahlii

Agapanthia dahlii

Agapanthia dahlii

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Porto

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

7 Verified sightings at Porto
27 In all 4 parks From 2019 to 2026
April Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Kiskunság National Park 🇭🇺 Hungary
~20%
2 Sierra Nevada National Park 🇪🇸 Spain
~10%
3 Camargue 🇫🇷 France
~10%
4 Cévennes National Park 🇫🇷 France
<5%

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Novosibirsk 🇷🇺 Russia
~10%
2 Bucharest 🇷🇴 Romania
~10%
3 Vienna 🇦🇹 Austria
<5%
4 Porto 🇵🇹 Portugal
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing an Agapanthia dahlii in Porto?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Agapanthia dahlii sighting in Porto on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 395th most-seen of the 498 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see an Agapanthia dahlii in Porto?

April and May

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Agapanthia dahlii in Porto on a given day, against under 5% in June to March, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see an Agapanthia dahlii?

Between 9 am and noon

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Agapanthia dahlii sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Porto the best place to see an Agapanthia dahlii?

4th of 4

Of the 4 cities where we can rate Agapanthia dahlii sightings, Porto ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Novosibirsk (Russia, about 10%), Bucharest (Romania, about 10%) and Vienna (Austria, under 5%).

Where does the Agapanthia dahlii sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Agapanthia dahlii is recorded against all the insects logged in Porto (7 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Porto