What are the chances of seeing a Maceda mansueta in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Maceda mansueta sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 402nd most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Maceda mansueta in Daintree National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Maceda mansueta in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, May–June and November, the lowest months. That is one of Daintree National Park's wettest months, with about 300 mm of rain against 50 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Maceda mansueta?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Maceda mansueta sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Daintree National Park the best place to see a Maceda mansueta?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Maceda mansueta sightings, Daintree National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Maceda mansueta live in Daintree National Park?
Same family: Nolidae
The closest relatives of the Maceda mansueta that you can see in Daintree National Park (family Nolidae, Tufted Moths) are Acatapaustus mesoleuca (about 10%), Aiteta iridias (about 10%) and Negeta contrariata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Maceda mansueta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Maceda mansueta is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.