What are the chances of seeing a Tropical Tiger Moth in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tropical Tiger Moth sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 339th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tropical Tiger Moth in Daintree National Park?
May and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Tropical Tiger Moth in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, July and September–November, the lowest months. Those are among Daintree National Park's driest months, with about 85 mm of rain a month against 380 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Tropical Tiger Moth?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tropical Tiger Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Daintree National Park the best place to see a Tropical Tiger Moth?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Tropical Tiger Moth sightings, Daintree National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kanha National Park (India, about 30%), Jim Corbett National Park (India, about 20%) and Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Tropical Tiger Moth live in Daintree National Park?
Same genus: Asota
The closest relatives of the Tropical Tiger Moth that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Asota) are Asota orbona (about 20%) and Asota heliconia (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tropical Tiger Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tropical Tiger Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.