Pyrrhogyra neaerea
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 3 | Iberá National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 4 | Soberanía National Park | 🇵🇦 Panama |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Leading Red-Ring sighting in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, based on 34 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 54th most-seen of the 279 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Leading Red-Ring in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August, the lowest month. That is one of Iguaçu National Park's wettest months, with about 240 mm of rain against 100 mm in August.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Leading Red-Ring sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Leading Red-Ring sightings, Iguaçu National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Leading Red-Ring that you can see in Iguaçu National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Agathina Emperor (about 70%), Hydaspes Eighty-Eight (about 50%) and Orange Mapwing (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Leading Red-Ring is recorded against all the insects logged in Iguaçu National Park (34 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
