What are the chances of seeing a Short-billed Minivet in Doi Inthanon National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Short-billed Minivet sighting in Doi Inthanon National Park on a given day, based on 427 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 95th most-seen of the 367 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Short-billed Minivet in Doi Inthanon National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Short-billed Minivet in Doi Inthanon National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Short-billed Minivet?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Short-billed Minivet sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Doi Inthanon National Park the best place to see a Short-billed Minivet?
Yes
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Short-billed Minivet sightings, Doi Inthanon National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 10%) and Langtang National Park (Nepal, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Short-billed Minivet live in Doi Inthanon National Park?
Same genus: Pericrocotus
The closest relatives of the Short-billed Minivet that you can see in Doi Inthanon National Park (genus Pericrocotus, Minivets) are Scarlet Minivet (about 20%), Long-tailed Minivet (about 20%) and Gray-chinned Minivet (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Short-billed Minivet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Short-billed Minivet is recorded against all the birds logged in Doi Inthanon National Park (427 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.