What are the chances of seeing a Blue Featherleg in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Featherleg sighting in Fertő-Hanság National Park on a given day, based on 33 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 18th most-seen of the 243 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue Featherleg in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
June
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Featherleg in Fertő-Hanság National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April and September–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue Featherleg?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue Featherleg sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Fertő-Hanság National Park the best place to see a Blue Featherleg?
6th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Blue Featherleg sightings, Fertő-Hanság National Park ranks 6th at about 20%. The best odds are in Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 30%), Plitvice Lakes National Park (Croatia, about 30%) and Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Blue Featherleg live in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
Same order: Odonata
The closest relatives of the Blue Featherleg that you can see in Fertő-Hanság National Park (order Odonata, Dragonflies and Damselflies) are Blue-Tailed Damselfly (about 30%), Azure Damselfly (about 20%) and Southern Darter (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue Featherleg sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue Featherleg is recorded against all the insects logged in Fertő-Hanság National Park (33 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.