What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Tailed Damselfly in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Tailed Damselfly sighting in Fertő-Hanság National Park on a given day, based on 61 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 2nd most-seen of the 243 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Tailed Damselfly in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
June
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Tailed Damselfly in Fertő-Hanság National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Tailed Damselfly?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Tailed Damselfly sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Fertő-Hanság National Park the best place to see a Blue-Tailed Damselfly?
4th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Blue-Tailed Damselfly sightings, Fertő-Hanság National Park ranks 4th at about 30%. The best odds are in Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 40%), Hortobágy National Park (Hungary, about 40%) and Camargue (France, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blue-Tailed Damselfly live in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
Same family: Coenagrionidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-Tailed Damselfly that you can see in Fertő-Hanság National Park (family Coenagrionidae, Narrow-winged Damselflies) are Azure Damselfly (about 20%), Dainty Damselfly (about 10%) and Common Blue Damselfly (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Tailed Damselfly sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Tailed Damselfly is recorded against all the insects logged in Fertő-Hanság National Park (61 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.