What are the chances of seeing an Alpine Accentor in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Accentor sighting in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 102nd most-seen of the 122 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Alpine Accentor in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
August
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Accentor in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July, September and December, the lowest months. January–April and October–November have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Alpine Accentor?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Alpine Accentor sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park the best place to see an Alpine Accentor?
13th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Alpine Accentor sightings, Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Picos de Europa National Park (Spain, about 30%), Taroko National Park (Taiwan, about 20%) and Tatra National Park (Slovakia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Alpine Accentor live in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
Same genus: Prunella
The closest relatives of the Alpine Accentor that you can see in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (genus Prunella, selfheals) are Brown Accentor (about 50%) and Mongolian Accentor (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Alpine Accentor sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Alpine Accentor is recorded against all the birds logged in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.