What are the chances of seeing a White-cheeked Starling in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-cheeked Starling sighting in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 102nd most-seen of the 122 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-cheeked Starling in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
May
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a White-cheeked Starling in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–September and December, the lowest months. January–April and October–November have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a White-cheeked Starling?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-cheeked Starling sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park the best place to see a White-cheeked Starling?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate White-cheeked Starling sightings, Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Nikko National Park (Japan, about 10%).
Which relatives of the White-cheeked Starling live in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the White-cheeked Starling that you can see in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Horned Lark (about 70%), Isabelline Wheatear (about 70%) and White-winged Snowfinch (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-cheeked Starling sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-cheeked Starling is recorded against all the birds logged in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.