What are the chances of seeing an Adelaide Marauding Katydid in Grampians National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Adelaide Marauding Katydid sighting in Grampians National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 43rd most-seen of the 148 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Adelaide Marauding Katydid in Grampians National Park?
September to January
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Adelaide Marauding Katydid in Grampians National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and May–August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Adelaide Marauding Katydid?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Adelaide Marauding Katydid sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Grampians National Park the best place to see an Adelaide Marauding Katydid?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Adelaide Marauding Katydid sightings, Grampians National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Adelaide Marauding Katydid live in Grampians National Park?
Same family: Tettigoniidae
The closest relatives of the Adelaide Marauding Katydid that you can see in Grampians National Park (family Tettigoniidae, Katydids) are Nanodectes harpax (about 10%), Greenish Meadow Katydid (about 10%) and Gumleaf Katydid (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Adelaide Marauding Katydid sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Adelaide Marauding Katydid is recorded against all the insects logged in Grampians National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.