What are the chances of seeing a Gumleaf Katydid in Grampians National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gumleaf Katydid sighting in Grampians National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 94th most-seen of the 148 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gumleaf Katydid in Grampians National Park?
February and April
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Gumleaf Katydid in Grampians National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and May–October, the lowest months. Those are among Grampians National Park's driest months, with about 35 mm of rain a month against 85 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Gumleaf Katydid?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gumleaf Katydid sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Grampians National Park the best place to see a Gumleaf Katydid?
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Gumleaf Katydid sightings, Grampians National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Gumleaf Katydid live in Grampians National Park?
Same family: Tettigoniidae
The closest relatives of the Gumleaf Katydid that you can see in Grampians National Park (family Tettigoniidae, Katydids) are Adelaide Marauding Katydid (about 20%), Nanodectes harpax (about 10%) and Greenish Meadow Katydid (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gumleaf Katydid sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gumleaf Katydid is recorded against all the insects logged in Grampians National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.