Conocephalus upoluensis
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grampians National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Springbrook National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 5 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Greenish Meadow Katydid sighting in Grampians National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 94th most-seen of the 148 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and September–October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Greenish Meadow Katydid in Grampians National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–August and November–January, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Greenish Meadow Katydid sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Greenish Meadow Katydid sightings, Grampians National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Tettigoniidae
The closest relatives of the Greenish Meadow Katydid that you can see in Grampians National Park (family Tettigoniidae, Katydids) are Adelaide Marauding Katydid (about 20%), Nanodectes harpax (about 10%) and Gumleaf Katydid (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Greenish Meadow Katydid is recorded against all the insects logged in Grampians National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
