What are the chances of seeing an American Avocet in Grand Teton National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an American Avocet sighting in Grand Teton National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 147th most-seen of the 185 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an American Avocet in Grand Teton National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report an American Avocet in Grand Teton National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see an American Avocet?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most American Avocet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Grand Teton National Park the best place to see an American Avocet?
12th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate American Avocet sightings, Grand Teton National Park ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (United States, about 20%), El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%) and Celestún Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the American Avocet live in Grand Teton National Park?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the American Avocet that you can see in Grand Teton National Park (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Spotted Sandpiper (about 20%), Killdeer (about 10%) and Ring-billed Gull (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the American Avocet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the American Avocet is recorded against all the birds logged in Grand Teton National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.