Endotricha pyrosalis
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
Endotricha pyrosalis is a moth of the family Pyralidae described by Achille Guenée in 1854. It is found in Australia and is common in Sydney and Melbourne. The wingspan is about 20 mm. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Endotricha pyrosalis sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 253rd most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January to April
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Endotricha pyrosalis in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to December, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Endotricha pyrosalis sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Endotricha pyrosalis sightings, Great Otway National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Pyralidae
The closest relatives of the Endotricha pyrosalis that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Pyralidae, Pyralid Snout Moths) are Wattle Gall Moth (about 20%), Mimaglossa nauplialis (about 10%) and Spectrotrota fimbrialis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Endotricha pyrosalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
