Mimaglossa nauplialis
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Macalla nauplialis is a species of moth of the family Pyralidae. It is found in Australia. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Mimaglossa nauplialis sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 71st most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April–May, August and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Mimaglossa nauplialis in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, June–July and December, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Mimaglossa nauplialis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Mimaglossa nauplialis sightings, Great Otway National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Pyralidae
The closest relatives of the Mimaglossa nauplialis that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Pyralidae, Pyralid Snout Moths) are Wattle Gall Moth (about 20%), Spectrotrota fimbrialis (about 10%) and Balanomis encyclia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Mimaglossa nauplialis is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
