Torbia viridissima
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grampians National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Springbrook National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gumleaf Katydid sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 226th most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February–May and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gumleaf Katydid in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–September and November–January, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gumleaf Katydid sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Gumleaf Katydid sightings, Great Otway National Park ranks 4th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Grampians National Park (Australia, about 10%), Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Tettigoniidae
The closest relatives of the Gumleaf Katydid that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Tettigoniidae, Katydids) are Adelaide Marauding Katydid (about 10%), Common Eastern Requena (about 10%) and Australian Twig-Mimicking Katydid (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gumleaf Katydid is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
