Hednota grammellus
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
Hednota grammellus is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Philipp Christoph Zeller in 1863. It is found in Australia, where it has been recorded from New South Wales and Victoria. The forewings are white with a pattern of brown lines. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hednota grammellus sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 286th most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Hednota grammellus in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to January, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hednota grammellus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Great Otway National Park, in our data
Great Otway National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Hednota grammellus sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Hednota
The closest relatives of the Hednota grammellus that you can see in Great Otway National Park (genus Hednota) are Hednota pleniferellus (about 10%) and Hednota relatalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hednota grammellus is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
