Hednota relatalis
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
Hednota relatalis is a moth of the family Crambidae described by Francis Walker in 1863. It is found in Australia, in Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, and Western Australia. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hednota relatalis sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 286th most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February to April
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hednota relatalis in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to January, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hednota relatalis sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Great Otway National Park, in our data
Great Otway National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Hednota relatalis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Hednota
The closest relatives of the Hednota relatalis that you can see in Great Otway National Park (genus Hednota) are Hednota pleniferellus (about 10%) and Hednota grammellus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hednota relatalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
