Hednota pleniferellus
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
Hednota pleniferellus is a species of moth of the family Crambidae. It is found in Australia, in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and Tasmania. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Booderee National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hednota pleniferellus sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 253rd most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
November to January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hednota pleniferellus in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to October, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hednota pleniferellus sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Hednota pleniferellus sightings, Great Otway National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Booderee National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same genus: Hednota
The closest relatives of the Hednota pleniferellus that you can see in Great Otway National Park (genus Hednota) are Hednota relatalis (about 10%) and Hednota grammellus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hednota pleniferellus is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
