What are the chances of seeing a Trigonistis asthenopa in Great Otway National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Trigonistis asthenopa sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 178th most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Trigonistis asthenopa in Great Otway National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Trigonistis asthenopa in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, April, July and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Trigonistis asthenopa?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Trigonistis asthenopa sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Great Otway National Park the best place to see a Trigonistis asthenopa?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Trigonistis asthenopa sightings, Great Otway National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Trigonistis asthenopa live in Great Otway National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Trigonistis asthenopa that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Southern Moon Moth (about 20%), Heliotrope Moth (about 10%) and Black-And-White Tiger Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Trigonistis asthenopa sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Trigonistis asthenopa is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.