What are the chances of seeing a Melanostoma mellina in Gros Morne National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Melanostoma mellina sighting in Gros Morne National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 36th most-seen of the 83 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Melanostoma mellina in Gros Morne National Park?
June–July and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Melanostoma mellina in Gros Morne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August and November–May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Melanostoma mellina?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Melanostoma mellina sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gros Morne National Park the best place to see a Melanostoma mellina?
3rd of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Melanostoma mellina sightings, Gros Morne National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (Canada, about 20%) and Great Bear Rainforest (Canada, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Melanostoma mellina live in Gros Morne National Park?
Same family: Syrphidae
The closest relatives of the Melanostoma mellina that you can see in Gros Morne National Park (family Syrphidae, Hover Flies) are Narrow-Banded Pond Fly (about 10%), Margined Calligrapher (about 10%) and Banded Thintail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Melanostoma mellina sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Melanostoma mellina is recorded against all the insects logged in Gros Morne National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.