What are the chances of seeing a Peacock Pansy in Gunung Leuser National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Peacock Pansy sighting in Gunung Leuser National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 16th most-seen of the 103 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Peacock Pansy in Gunung Leuser National Park?
October
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Peacock Pansy in Gunung Leuser National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, August and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Peacock Pansy?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Peacock Pansy sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gunung Leuser National Park the best place to see a Peacock Pansy?
Among the best
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Peacock Pansy sightings, Gunung Leuser National Park ranks 5th at about 30%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 30%), Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 30%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Peacock Pansy live in Gunung Leuser National Park?
Same genus: Junonia
The closest relatives of the Peacock Pansy that you can see in Gunung Leuser National Park (genus Junonia, Buckeyes & Pansies) are Chocolate Pansy (about 30%), Blue Pansy (about 30%) and Grey Pansy (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Peacock Pansy sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Peacock Pansy is recorded against all the insects logged in Gunung Leuser National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.