What are the chances of seeing a Camponotus terebrans in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Camponotus terebrans sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 14th most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Camponotus terebrans in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Camponotus terebrans in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May, August and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Camponotus terebrans?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Camponotus terebrans sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Camponotus terebrans?
Only Hattah-Kulkyne National Park, in our data
Hattah-Kulkyne National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Camponotus terebrans sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Camponotus terebrans live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same genus: Camponotus
The closest relatives of the Camponotus terebrans that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (genus Camponotus, Carpenter Ants, Typical Sugar Ants and Allies) are Camponotus aurocinctus (about 20%) and Camponotus cinereus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Camponotus terebrans sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Camponotus terebrans is recorded against all the insects logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.