What are the chances of seeing a Myrmecia desertorum in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Myrmecia desertorum sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 6th most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Myrmecia desertorum in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
June
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Myrmecia desertorum in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, May, July and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Myrmecia desertorum?
Between 4 and 7 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Myrmecia desertorum sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hattah-Kulkyne National Park the best place to see a Myrmecia desertorum?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Myrmecia desertorum sightings, Hattah-Kulkyne National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Myrmecia desertorum live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same family: Formicidae
The closest relatives of the Myrmecia desertorum that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (family Formicidae, Ants) are Camponotus terebrans (about 20%), Camponotus aurocinctus (about 20%) and Camponotus cinereus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Myrmecia desertorum sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Myrmecia desertorum is recorded against all the insects logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.