What are the chances of seeing a Camponotus aurocinctus in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Camponotus aurocinctus sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 25th most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Camponotus aurocinctus in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Camponotus aurocinctus in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–August and November–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Camponotus aurocinctus?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Camponotus aurocinctus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hattah-Kulkyne National Park the best place to see a Camponotus aurocinctus?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Camponotus aurocinctus sightings, Hattah-Kulkyne National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Camponotus aurocinctus live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same genus: Camponotus
The closest relatives of the Camponotus aurocinctus that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (genus Camponotus, Carpenter Ants, Typical Sugar Ants and Allies) are Camponotus terebrans (about 20%) and Camponotus cinereus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Camponotus aurocinctus sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Camponotus aurocinctus is recorded against all the insects logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.