What are the chances of seeing a Nomophila corticalis in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Nomophila corticalis sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 43rd most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Nomophila corticalis in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
April and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Nomophila corticalis in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July and October–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Nomophila corticalis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Nomophila corticalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Where else can you see a Nomophila corticalis?
Only Hattah-Kulkyne National Park, in our data
Hattah-Kulkyne National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Nomophila corticalis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Nomophila corticalis live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Nomophila corticalis that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Cabbage Centre Grub (about 20%), Poroporo Fruit Borer (about 10%) and Cotton Web Spinner (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Nomophila corticalis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Nomophila corticalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.