What are the chances of seeing a Red-Lined Looper in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-Lined Looper sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 14th most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-Lined Looper in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
April and May
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Red-Lined Looper in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, June–August and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-Lined Looper?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-Lined Looper sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Hattah-Kulkyne National Park the best place to see a Red-Lined Looper?
Yes
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Red-Lined Looper sightings, Hattah-Kulkyne National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Booderee National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red-Lined Looper live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Red-Lined Looper that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Scopula lydia (about 20%), Apple Looper (about 10%) and Chrysolarentia tristis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-Lined Looper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-Lined Looper is recorded against all the insects logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.