What are the chances of seeing a White-backed Swallow in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-backed Swallow sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 137th most-seen of the 170 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-backed Swallow in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-backed Swallow in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a White-backed Swallow?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-backed Swallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hattah-Kulkyne National Park the best place to see a White-backed Swallow?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate White-backed Swallow sightings, Hattah-Kulkyne National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Flinders Ranges National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the White-backed Swallow live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same family: Hirundinidae
The closest relatives of the White-backed Swallow that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (family Hirundinidae, Swallows and Martins) are Tree Martin (about 10%) and Welcome Swallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-backed Swallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-backed Swallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.