What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Tanager in Henri Pittier National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Tanager sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 345th most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Tanager in Henri Pittier National Park?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Tanager in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Tanager?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Tanager?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Black-faced Tanager sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Tanager live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Tanager that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Blue-gray Tanager (about 70%), Bay-headed Tanager (about 50%) and Palm Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.