What are the chances of seeing a Cardinal Butterfly in Hortobágy National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Cardinal Butterfly sighting in Hortobágy National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 4th most-seen of the 22 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cardinal Butterfly in Hortobágy National Park?
June
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Cardinal Butterfly in Hortobágy National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April and October, the lowest months. That is one of Hortobágy National Park's wettest months, with about 70 mm of rain against 30 mm in March.
What time of day is best to see a Cardinal Butterfly?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cardinal Butterfly sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hortobágy National Park the best place to see a Cardinal Butterfly?
2nd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Cardinal Butterfly sightings, Hortobágy National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%. The best odds are in Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Cardinal Butterfly live in Hortobágy National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Cardinal Butterfly that you can see in Hortobágy National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Meadow Brown (about 20%), Small Heath (about 20%) and Red Admiral (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cardinal Butterfly sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cardinal Butterfly is recorded against all the insects logged in Hortobágy National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.