What are the chances of seeing a Raquet-tailed Roller in Hwange National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Raquet-tailed Roller sighting in Hwange National Park on a given day, based on 63 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 108th most-seen of the 308 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Raquet-tailed Roller in Hwange National Park?
June and October–November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Raquet-tailed Roller in Hwange National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, the lowest month. Those are among Hwange National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 150 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Raquet-tailed Roller?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Raquet-tailed Roller sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hwange National Park the best place to see a Raquet-tailed Roller?
2nd of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Raquet-tailed Roller sightings, Hwange National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Mikumi National Park (Tanzania, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Raquet-tailed Roller live in Hwange National Park?
Same genus: Coracias
The closest relatives of the Raquet-tailed Roller that you can see in Hwange National Park (genus Coracias, Typical Rollers) are Lilac-breasted Roller (about 70%), Rufous-crowned Roller (about 20%) and European Roller (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Raquet-tailed Roller sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Raquet-tailed Roller is recorded against all the birds logged in Hwange National Park (63 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.