Hypselonotus fulvus
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henri Pittier National Park | 🇻🇪 Venezuela | |
| 2 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fortaleza | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Santa Cruz de la Sierra | 🇧🇴 Bolivia | |
| 3 | Vitória | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 4 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | Brasilia | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 6 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 7 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypselonotus fulvus sighting in Iguazú National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 269th most-seen of the 306 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March, May, July, October and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypselonotus fulvus in Iguazú National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, April, June, August–September and November, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hypselonotus fulvus sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Hypselonotus fulvus sightings, Iguazú National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Henri Pittier National Park (Venezuela, about 10%).
Same genus: Hypselonotus
The closest relatives of the Hypselonotus fulvus that you can see in Iguazú National Park (genus Hypselonotus) are Hypselonotus bitrianguliger (about 10%) and Hypselonotus interruptus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hypselonotus fulvus is recorded against all the insects logged in Iguazú National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
