Carineta diardi
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Itatiaia National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Serra da Canastra National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 3 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 4 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | Tijuca National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Carineta diardi sighting in Iguazú National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 106th most-seen of the 306 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
September
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Carineta diardi in Iguazú National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–July and October–December, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Carineta diardi sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Carineta diardi sightings, Iguazú National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Itatiaia National Park (Brazil, about 40%) and Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Same family: Cicadidae
The closest relatives of the Carineta diardi that you can see in Iguazú National Park (family Cicadidae, Typical Cicadas) are Giant Cicada (about 10%), Green Shield Cicada (about 10%) and Fidicina torresi (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Carineta diardi is recorded against all the insects logged in Iguazú National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
