What are the chances of seeing a Stolid Flycatcher in Jaragua National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Stolid Flycatcher sighting in Jaragua National Park on a given day, based on 111 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 6th most-seen of the 92 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Stolid Flycatcher in Jaragua National Park?
January
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Stolid Flycatcher in Jaragua National Park on a given day, against about 30% in March–April, October and December, the lowest months. That is one of Jaragua National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 120 mm in October. June to September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Stolid Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Stolid Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Jaragua National Park the best place to see a Stolid Flycatcher?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Stolid Flycatcher sightings, Jaragua National Park ranks 2nd at about 40%. The best odds are in Los Haitises National Park (Dominican Republic, about 50%).
Which relatives of the Stolid Flycatcher live in Jaragua National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Stolid Flycatcher that you can see in Jaragua National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Gray Kingbird (about 30%) and Hispaniolan Pewee (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Stolid Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Stolid Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Jaragua National Park (111 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.