What are the chances of seeing a Falcated Duck in Kaziranga National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Falcated Duck sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 126 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 162nd most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Falcated Duck in Kaziranga National Park?
December and January
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Falcated Duck in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and September–October, the lowest months. Those are among Kaziranga National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain a month against 520 mm in June. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Falcated Duck?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Falcated Duck sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Falcated Duck?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Falcated Duck sightings, Kaziranga National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Keoladeo National Park (India, under 5%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Falcated Duck live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same genus: Mareca
The closest relatives of the Falcated Duck that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (genus Mareca, Wigeons and Allies) are Gadwall (about 40%) and Eurasian Wigeon (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Falcated Duck sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Falcated Duck is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (126 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.