What are the chances of seeing a Short-billed Minivet in Kaziranga National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Short-billed Minivet sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 33 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 226th most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Short-billed Minivet in Kaziranga National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Short-billed Minivet in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Short-billed Minivet?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Short-billed Minivet sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Short-billed Minivet?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Short-billed Minivet sightings, Kaziranga National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Doi Inthanon National Park (Thailand, about 20%), Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 10%) and Langtang National Park (Nepal, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Short-billed Minivet live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same genus: Pericrocotus
The closest relatives of the Short-billed Minivet that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (genus Pericrocotus, Minivets) are Scarlet Minivet (about 20%) and Long-tailed Minivet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Short-billed Minivet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Short-billed Minivet is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (33 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.