What are the chances of seeing a Sooty Barbet in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sooty Barbet sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 154th most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sooty Barbet in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sooty Barbet in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. January has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Sooty Barbet?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sooty Barbet sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Sooty Barbet?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Sooty Barbet sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 40%), Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 40%) and Gunung Leuser National Park (Indonesia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sooty Barbet live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same family: Megalaimidae
The closest relatives of the Sooty Barbet that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (family Megalaimidae, Asian Barbets) are Black-browed Barbet (about 70%), Fire-tufted Barbet (about 70%) and Gold-whiskered Barbet (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sooty Barbet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sooty Barbet is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.